Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (0) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Hypernative Hypernative is a real-time security platform that monitors Solana and other Web3 ecosystems for exploits, economic attacks, governance risks, and protocol anomalies before funds are lost. It combines...
Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Hypernative (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Hacken uses a paid model, while Hypernative is paid.
Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Hypernative counters with 5 features including Real-time threat detection, Automated response playbooks, On-chain + off-chain signals, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Hypernative is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Hypernative stands out for used by major defi protocols, sub-second detection latency, actionable alerts, not just dashboards. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Hypernative's main drawback is enterprise-focused pricing.
More comparisons
Compare Hacken with…
Compare Hypernative with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 132,314 | 77 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise | Real-time Web3 threat detection and prevention for Solana protocols |
Both Hacken and Hypernative operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hacken has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — check Hacken's pricing and check Hypernative's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.