Hacken vs Immunefi

Overview

Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Immunefi Immunefi is Web3's leading bug-bounty and security-services platform, protecting over $190 billion in user funds across the industry. It connects protocols with the whitehat researcher community. Sec...

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Immunefi (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Hacken uses a paid model, while Immunefi is freemium.

Key Features

Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Immunefi counters with 5 features including Leading Web3 bug-bounty platform, Protects $190B+ in user funds, Rewards for disclosing vulnerabilities in Solana programs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Immunefi is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Immunefi stands out for continuous security beyond one-time audits, aligns incentives with whitehat researchers, industry-leading scale and payouts. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Immunefi's main drawback is for protocol teams and researchers, not end users.