Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 23, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (2) | (2) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Immunefi Immunefi is Web3's leading bug-bounty and security-services platform, protecting over $190 billion in user funds across the industry. It connects protocols with the whitehat researcher community. Sec...
Both Hacken and Immunefi hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Hacken uses a paid model, while Immunefi is freemium.
Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Immunefi counters with 5 features including Leading Web3 bug-bounty platform, Protects $190B+ in user funds, Rewards for disclosing vulnerabilities in Solana programs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 98.1% uptime over the last 30 days. Immunefi is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Immunefi stands out for continuous security beyond one-time audits, aligns incentives with whitehat researchers, industry-leading scale and payouts. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Immunefi's main drawback is for protocol teams and researchers, not end users.
More comparisons
Compare Hacken with…
Compare Immunefi with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 130,871 | 75,383 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise | Web3's leading bug bounty platform protecting $190B+ in funds |
Both Hacken and Immunefi operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Hacken's pricing and Immunefi is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.