Hacken vs SilentSwap

Overview

Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... SilentSwap SilentSwap enables private cross-chain token swaps using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) while maintaining OFAC compliance. It is designed for users who want transaction privacy without stepping...

Community Ratings

Hacken is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for SilentSwap (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.

Pricing & Value

Hacken uses a paid model, while SilentSwap is paid.

Key Features

Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. SilentSwap counters with 5 features including Private cross-chain swaps via Trusted Execution Environments, OFAC compliance screening built into swaps, Support for 8+ chains including Solana, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.

Reliability & Health

We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. SilentSwap is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.

Strengths

Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. SilentSwap stands out for combines transaction privacy with regulatory compliance, predictable flat 1% fee structure, cross-chain coverage across 8+ networks. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while SilentSwap's main drawback is tee reliance introduces execution-environment trust assumptions.