Head-to-head · Security & Audit
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | multi chain | multi chain |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hacken Hacken is a blockchain security and compliance firm, founded in 2017, that provides end-to-end protection for Web3 projects, with smart contract audit coverage for Solana among many other ecosystems.... Zellic Zellic is a premier blockchain security firm specializing in smart contract audits for Solana and other chains. Founded by veteran security researchers, Zellic has audited some of the most critical pr...
Both Hacken and Zellic hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Hacken uses a paid model, while Zellic is paid.
Hacken offers 5 features including Manual smart contract audits with Solana coverage, Infrastructure, dApp, cryptography, AI-security, and tokenomics audits, Penetration testing and red teaming, and 2 more. Zellic counters with 5 features including Manual smart contract audits for Solana/Rust, Formal verification and symbolic analysis, Vulnerability research and responsible disclosure, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hacken currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Zellic is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hacken's key strengths include broad coverage from code audits to compliance and live monitoring, long track record since 2017 with 2,000+ public assessments delivered, solana smart-contract auditing alongside many other chains. Zellic stands out for audited top-tier protocols (wormhole, pyth, layerzero), deep solana/rust expertise, thorough manual review process. On the flip side, Hacken's weaknesses include enterprise-oriented; audit pricing requires contacting the firm (not self-serve), while Zellic's main drawback is premium pricing for audit engagements.
More comparisons
Compare Hacken with…
Compare Zellic with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 133,975 | 17,904 |
| Categories | Security & Audit | Security & Audit |
| Description | Blockchain security audit firm with Solana smart contract expertise | Elite smart contract security audits trusted by top Solana protocols |
Both Hacken and Zellic operate in the security & audit space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Hacken's pricing and check Zellic's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.