Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 2 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hyperstack Hyperstack by HyperTek is data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana: developers define a single schema relating their on-chain accounts, and the platform auto-provisions everything around it. From that o... Irys Irys (formerly Bundlr) is a programmable datachain that provides permanent, verifiable data storage for blockchain applications. In the Solana ecosystem, Irys is widely used for storing NFT metadata,...
Both Hyperstack and Irys hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Hyperstack uses a freemium model, while Irys is paid.
Hyperstack offers 5 features including Single schema definition relating on-chain accounts, Auto-provisioned RPC management and account transforms, Websocket streaming generated from the schema, and 2 more. Irys counters with 5 features including Permanent data storage with one-time payment, SOL payment support for Solana developers, NFT metadata and image hosting, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hyperstack currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Irys is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hyperstack's key strengths include schema-first workflow collapses backend and frontend data plumbing, generated react hooks speed the path from data to live ui, keeps on-chain backend and frontend in sync without glue code. Irys stands out for permanent storage eliminates hosting concerns, native sol payment integration, widely used in solana nft ecosystem. On the flip side, Hyperstack's weaknesses include hackathon-recognized infrastructure is typically early-stage, while Irys's main drawback is cost scales with data size.
More comparisons
Compare Hyperstack with…
Compare Irys with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 15,401 | 239,397 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Data & Indexing | Data & Indexing |
| Description | Data-infrastructure-as-code for Solana — schema in, RPC + streaming + React hooks out | Programmable datachain for permanent on-chain data storage |
Both Hyperstack and Irys operate in the data & indexing space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Hyperstack is free to start and check Irys's pricing. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.