Head-to-head · Data & Indexing
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 17, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Irys Irys (formerly Bundlr) is a programmable datachain that provides permanent, verifiable data storage for blockchain applications. In the Solana ecosystem, Irys is widely used for storing NFT metadata,... Nodit Nodit is a Web3 development infrastructure platform that provides indexed blockchain data APIs, managed RPC node services, and real-time event streams and webhooks across multiple chains, including So...
Both Irys and Nodit hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Irys uses a paid model, while Nodit is freemium.
Irys offers 5 features including Permanent data storage with one-time payment, SOL payment support for Solana developers, NFT metadata and image hosting, and 2 more. Nodit counters with 5 features including Indexed Web3 Data APIs for tokens, transactions, balances, and NFTs, Managed RPC node service with reliable endpoints, Real-time event streams and webhooks, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Irys currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Nodit is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Irys's key strengths include permanent storage eliminates hosting concerns, native sol payment integration, widely used in solana nft ecosystem. Nodit stands out for unified data, rpc, and streaming backend in one platform, enterprise-grade reliability and slas, removes the need to self-host indexers and nodes. On the flip side, Irys's weaknesses include cost scales with data size, while Nodit's main drawback is solana support is newer than some incumbents.
We recommend trying both — check Irys's pricing and Nodit is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.
More comparisons
Compare Irys with…
Compare Nodit with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 229,741 | 6,721 |
| Categories | Data & Indexing | API Platforms, Data & Indexing, RPC Providers |
| Description | Programmable datachain for permanent on-chain data storage | Enterprise Web3 data and RPC infrastructure with indexed APIs, nodes, and event streams. |