Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 15, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Jupiter Perpetuals Jupiter Perpetuals is the perpetual futures venue from Jupiter, Solana's leading swap aggregator, offering on-chain leveraged trading on SOL, ETH, and BTC with up to 100x leverage. It is one of the hi... Magna Magna is a Y Combinator-backed token infrastructure platform for managing vesting, cap tables, and compliant token distributions. Automates complex unlock and vesting schedules with audited on-chain c...
Both Jupiter Perpetuals and Magna hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Jupiter Perpetuals uses a free model, while Magna is freemium. Jupiter Perpetuals has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Magna's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
Jupiter Perpetuals offers 5 features including On-chain perpetual futures on SOL, ETH, and BTC, Up to 100x leverage, JLP liquidity pool backing trades, and 2 more. Magna counters with 7 features including Audited on-chain vesting contracts, Automated token unlock schedules, Tax withholding and compliance tools, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Jupiter Perpetuals currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Magna is rated healthy with 97.9% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Jupiter Perpetuals's key strengths include deep liquidity via the jlp pool, no order book needed, one of the highest-volume perps venues on solana, oracle pricing reduces slippage for size. Magna stands out for y combinator backed, $2.4b+ tvl in audited contracts, 70+ protocols trust the platform. On the flip side, Jupiter Perpetuals's weaknesses include high leverage greatly amplifies liquidation risk, while Magna's main drawback is enterprise-focused, may be overkill for small projects.
More comparisons
Compare Jupiter Perpetuals with…
Compare Magna with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 616,673 | 9,854 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Perp DEXs | DeFi & Yield |
| Description | Decentralized perpetual futures trading on Solana | Token vesting, cap tables, and compliant distribution infrastructure |
Both Jupiter Perpetuals and Magna operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Jupiter Perpetuals is free to start and Magna is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.