Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 7 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kiln Kiln is the leading institutional staking platform operating 50,000+ validators and managing over $14 billion in staked assets across 50+ Proof-of-Stake networks. For Solana, Kiln represents approxima... Picasso Network Picasso Network enables SOL restaking to secure Actively Validated Services and provides trust-minimized IBC connections between Solana and Cosmos ecosystems. Supports SOL, mSOL, jitoSOL, and bSOL for...
Kiln is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Picasso Network (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Kiln uses a freemium model, while Picasso Network is free. Picasso Network has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Kiln's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Kiln offers 7 features including 50,000+ validators across 50+ PoS networks, $14B+ in managed staked assets, 2.5% of entire Solana network stake, and 4 more. Picasso Network counters with 5 features including SOL and LST restaking for AVS security, IBC bridge connecting Solana to Cosmos, Fee-sharing model for stakers and restakers, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kiln currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Picasso Network is rated healthy with 28.1% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kiln's key strengths include enterprise-grade with soc 2 compliance, massive scale provides reliability, no minimum makes it accessible to everyone. Picasso Network stands out for first protocol bringing ibc interoperability to solana, attractive fee-sharing rewards for restakers, expands solana cross-chain connectivity. On the flip side, Kiln's weaknesses include primarily targets institutional clients, while Picasso Network's main drawback is lower tvl than jito restaking.
More comparisons
Compare Kiln with…
Compare Picasso Network with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 11,965 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Bridges |
| Description | Enterprise-grade staking platform managing $14B+ across 50+ PoS networks including Solana | Solana restaking protocol enabling IBC cross-chain connections to Cosmos |
Both Kiln and Picasso Network operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Kiln has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Kiln is free to start and Picasso Network is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.