Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kyros Kyros is a Solana liquid staking protocol designed to optimize staking yields by distributing SOL across top-performing validators. Rather than picking a single validator, it spreads stake to pursue s... Sanctum Infinity Sanctum Infinity (INF) is a multi-LST liquidity pool that aggregates liquidity across Solana's entire liquid-staking ecosystem. Rather than backing one validator, INF is backed by a basket of many LST...
Kyros is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Sanctum Infinity (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Kyros uses a free model, while Sanctum Infinity is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Kyros offers 5 features including Liquid staking that issues kySOL for staked positions, SOL distributed across top-performing validators, kySOL deployable across DeFi for additional yield, and 2 more. Sanctum Infinity counters with 5 features including Multi-LST liquidity pool aggregating the LST ecosystem, INF token backed by a basket of many LSTs, Instant, low-slippage swaps between supported LSTs, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kyros currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum Infinity is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kyros's key strengths include spreads stake across validators to pursue resilient yields, liquid kysol keeps capital usable instead of locked, composable across defi to stack additional yield. Sanctum Infinity stands out for diversifies validator and protocol risk across lsts, provides deep instant-unstake liquidity, blended yield from multiple sources.
More comparisons
Compare Kyros with…
Compare Sanctum Infinity with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,959 | 80,425 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Liquid staking protocol maximizing Solana DeFi yields | The infinite liquidity pool for all Solana liquid staking tokens |
Both Kyros and Sanctum Infinity operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Kyros has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Kyros is free to start and Sanctum Infinity is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.