Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 25, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 8 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Marinade Finance Marinade Finance is the largest liquid staking protocol on Solana, enabling users to stake their SOL tokens while maintaining liquidity through the mSOL liquid staking token. By delegating SOL to Mari... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.8/5 stars across 4 reviews, compared to 4.0/5 for Marinade Finance (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Marinade Finance uses a free model — No fee to stake. Marinade takes a small management fee from staking rewards. Unstaking has a small delay for native staking., while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Marinade Finance offers 8 features including Liquid staking with mSOL token that accrues rewards automatically, Smart delegation across 400+ validators for optimal yield and decentralization, Native staking option for users who prefer traditional validator delegation, and 5 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Marinade Finance currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
More comparisons
Compare Marinade Finance with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 75,757 | 80,504 |
| Categories | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | The leading liquid staking protocol on Solana | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Marinade Finance's key strengths include largest liquid staking protocol on solana with deepest msol defi integration, earn staking rewards while maintaining full liquidity through msol, promotes solana decentralization by distributing stake across hundreds of validators. Sanctum stands out for solves lst liquidity fragmentation with unified infinity pool, enables any validator to create their own lst — democratizes liquid staking, inf token provides diversified staking exposure without picking individual lsts. On the flip side, Marinade Finance's weaknesses include small fee on staking rewards reduces net yield compared to direct staking, while Sanctum's main drawback is smart contract risk across the multi-lst pool infrastructure.
Both Marinade Finance and Sanctum operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Marinade Finance is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.