Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
MetaMask Solana Snap MetaMask Solana Snap adds full Solana support to the MetaMask browser wallet through the Snaps extension framework. It lets the dominant EVM wallet operate on Solana without a separate app. Users can... Openfort Openfort provides embedded wallet infrastructure for building web3 games and applications on Solana. Instead of forcing players and users to install a separate wallet extension, developers can embed w...
Openfort is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 3.0/5 for MetaMask Solana Snap (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
MetaMask Solana Snap uses a free model, while Openfort is freemium. MetaMask Solana Snap has the edge for users who want a no-cost solution, though Openfort's paid features may justify the investment for power users.
MetaMask Solana Snap offers 5 features including Adds Solana support to MetaMask via Snaps, Manage SOL and SPL tokens in MetaMask, Connect to Solana dApps, and 2 more. Openfort counters with 5 features including Embedded wallet creation via a simple API, Transaction signing and session management, Gas sponsorship for gasless user experiences, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. MetaMask Solana Snap currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Openfort is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
MetaMask Solana Snap's key strengths include brings solana to the most widely used evm wallet, no need to install a separate solana wallet, convenient for multichain users. Openfort stands out for removes wallet-install friction for end users, gasless flows improve onboarding and retention, account abstraction enables flexible security policies.
More comparisons
Compare MetaMask Solana Snap with…
Compare Openfort with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,430,686 | — |
| Categories | Wallets | Wallets, Gaming |
| Description | Native Solana support inside the MetaMask browser wallet | Embedded smart wallet infrastructure for games and apps on Solana |
Both MetaMask Solana Snap and Openfort operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Openfort has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — MetaMask Solana Snap is free to start and Openfort is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.