Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Orangefin Orangefin is a non-custodial mobile staking wallet for Solana, built by Sol Strategies, a Nasdaq-listed blockchain infrastructure company. It lets users stake SOL directly from their phone while keepi... Snowflake Snowflake is a trusted, open-source multisig wallet on Solana built for teams, DAOs, and security-conscious users who need shared control over funds. Rather than relying on a single private key, it su...
Both Orangefin and Snowflake hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Orangefin uses a free model, while Snowflake is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Orangefin offers 5 features including Non-custodial mobile staking for Solana, 0% commission staking, Automatic Jito MEV reward harvesting, and 2 more. Snowflake counters with 5 features including Customizable multisig signature thresholds, Token vesting schedules, Scheduled payroll and recurring payments, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Orangefin currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Snowflake is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Orangefin's key strengths include non-custodial — users keep control of their keys, 0% commission maximizes staking returns, automatic mev harvesting adds reward on top of yield. Snowflake stands out for shared control removes single-point-of-failure key risk, treasury automation (payroll, vesting, recurring payments) built in, defi actions run under the same approval controls. On the flip side, Orangefin's weaknesses include staking apy is variable and not guaranteed, while Snowflake's main drawback is coordinating multiple signers adds operational overhead.
More comparisons
Compare Orangefin with…
Compare Snowflake with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,208 | 2,445 |
| Categories | Wallets, Staking | Wallets |
| Description | Non-custodial Solana staking app with 0% commission and MEV rewards | Open-source multisig wallet with DeFi automation for Solana |
Both Orangefin and Snowflake operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Orangefin is free to start and Snowflake is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.