Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 30, 2026
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Orangefin Orangefin is a non-custodial mobile staking wallet for Solana, built by Sol Strategies, a Nasdaq-listed blockchain infrastructure company. It lets users stake SOL directly from their phone while keepi... StakeView StakeView is a Solana validator performance ranking tool designed to help SOL holders make informed staking decisions. It surfaces historical APY, commission changes, and performance metrics across va...
Both Orangefin and StakeView hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Orangefin uses a free model, while StakeView is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Orangefin offers 5 features including Non-custodial mobile staking for Solana, 0% commission staking, Automatic Jito MEV reward harvesting, and 2 more. StakeView counters with 5 features including Historical APY tracking across Solana validators, Commission change history to catch fee increases, Performance metrics for reliability comparison, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Orangefin currently has a healthy health status with 99.2% uptime over the last 30 days. StakeView is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Orangefin's key strengths include non-custodial — users keep control of their keys, 0% commission maximizes staking returns, automatic mev harvesting adds reward on top of yield. StakeView stands out for makes opaque validator selection a data-driven choice, commission history protects delegators from surprise fee hikes, historical view helps identify consistently reliable validators. On the flip side, Orangefin's weaknesses include staking apy is variable and not guaranteed, while StakeView's main drawback is past validator performance does not guarantee future yields.
More comparisons
Compare Orangefin with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 1,224 | — |
| Categories | Wallets, Staking | Staking |
| Description | Non-custodial Solana staking app with 0% commission and MEV rewards | Solana validator performance rankings with historical APY tracking |
Both Orangefin and StakeView operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — Orangefin is free to start and StakeView is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.