Head-to-head · Wallets
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 31, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (3) | (2) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Salmon Salmon is an open-source, community-owned Solana wallet delivered as a browser extension, built with an emphasis on transparency and security. Its standout feature is transaction simulation, which pre... Snowflake Snowflake is a trusted, open-source multisig wallet on Solana built for teams, DAOs, and security-conscious users who need shared control over funds. Rather than relying on a single private key, it su...
Snowflake is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 2 reviews, compared to 4.3/5 for Salmon (3 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Salmon uses a free model, while Snowflake is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Salmon offers 5 features including Open-source, community-owned Solana wallet browser extension, Transaction simulation to preview outcomes before signing, Full SPL token support, and 2 more. Snowflake counters with 5 features including Customizable multisig signature thresholds, Token vesting schedules, Scheduled payroll and recurring payments, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Salmon currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Snowflake is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Salmon's key strengths include open, auditable code lets users verify how keys are handled, transaction simulation helps catch malicious actions before signing, community-owned framing aligns incentives with users. Snowflake stands out for shared control removes single-point-of-failure key risk, treasury automation (payroll, vesting, recurring payments) built in, defi actions run under the same approval controls.
More comparisons
Compare Salmon with…
Compare Snowflake with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 2 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 7,303 | 2,462 |
| Categories | Wallets | Wallets |
| Description | Open-source community Solana wallet with transaction simulation | Open-source multisig wallet with DeFi automation for Solana |
Both Salmon and Snowflake operate in the wallets space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Snowflake has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Salmon is free to start and Snowflake is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.