Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated August 29, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (3) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Robinhood Chain | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 4 features | 8 features |
| Upvotes |
This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through our link, at no extra cost to you.
Pros & cons
Analysis
Sherwood Protocol Sherwood is a vault protocol that lets an AI agent run an on-chain fund without ever holding the keys. Capital sits in a standard ERC-4626 vault, the agent publishes a strategy proposal committing in... Zeta Markets Zeta Markets is a decentralized derivatives exchange on Solana offering perpetual futures and options trading with on-chain order books. It provides advanced trading tools for derivatives traders who...
Zeta Markets is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 3.0/5 for Sherwood Protocol (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Sherwood Protocol uses a free model, while Zeta Markets is free — No platform fee. Trading fees: maker -0.01% (rebate), taker 0.05%. Fees reduced at higher volume tiers.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Sherwood Protocol offers 4 features including ERC-4626 vaults with agent-managed strategies and share-weighted depositor voting, Guardian network that replays proposal calldata on a fork, with slashing for bad approvals, Published four-fee waterfall with numeric caps and no AUM fee, and 1 more. Zeta Markets counters with 8 features including On-chain central limit order book for perpetual futures, Cross-margin system for portfolio-level capital efficiency, Limit orders, stop-losses, and take-profit at protocol level, and 5 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Sherwood Protocol currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Zeta Markets is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Sherwood Protocol's key strengths include unusual security model — pre-committed calldata reviewed by economically slashable guardians rather than a trusted keeper, fee structure fully published with caps, and performance fees accrue only on profit, documentation depth well above the norm for projects on this chain.
More comparisons
Compare Sherwood Protocol with…
Compare Zeta Markets with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 1 |
| ▲ 3 |
| Twitter Followers | 2,869 | 3,339 |
| Categories | AI Agents, DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield, Perp DEXs |
| Description | Agent-managed ERC-4626 vaults where staked guardians replay every strategy before it executes | Decentralized perpetual futures exchange on Solana |
Both Sherwood Protocol and Zeta Markets operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Zeta Markets has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Sherwood Protocol is free to start and Zeta Markets is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.