Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated October 11, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (0) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
StakeView StakeView is a Solana validator performance ranking tool designed to help SOL holders make informed staking decisions. It surfaces historical APY, commission changes, and performance metrics across va... Staking Facilities Staking Facilities operates enterprise-grade, bare-metal validators in German data centers, serving Solana and other proof-of-stake networks. The focus is on high-performance, reliable infrastructure...
StakeView is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 0.0/5 for Staking Facilities (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
StakeView uses a free model, while Staking Facilities is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
StakeView offers 5 features including Historical APY tracking across Solana validators, Commission change history to catch fee increases, Performance metrics for reliability comparison, and 2 more. Staking Facilities counters with 5 features including Enterprise-grade bare-metal validators in German data centers, 0% Solana validator commission fees, Non-custodial delegation — keep custody of your SOL, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. StakeView currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Staking Facilities is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
StakeView's key strengths include makes opaque validator selection a data-driven choice, commission history protects delegators from surprise fee hikes, historical view helps identify consistently reliable validators. Staking Facilities stands out for 0% commission makes it highly cost-effective, non-custodial delegation preserves user control of assets, bare-metal infrastructure supports reliable performance.
More comparisons
Compare StakeView with…
Compare Staking Facilities with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 5,479 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Solana validator performance rankings with historical APY tracking | High-performance Solana validator with 0% commission fees |
Both StakeView and Staking Facilities operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. StakeView has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — StakeView is free to start and Staking Facilities is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.