Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
StakeView StakeView is a Solana validator performance ranking tool designed to help SOL holders make informed staking decisions. It surfaces historical APY, commission changes, and performance metrics across va... Starke Finance Starke Finance is a Solana staking-analytics platform that helps users compare validators on performance, fees, and security to make informed delegation decisions. It is a research tool, not a staking...
StakeView is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.0/5 for Starke Finance (1 review). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
StakeView uses a free model, while Starke Finance is free. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
StakeView offers 5 features including Historical APY tracking across Solana validators, Commission change history to catch fee increases, Performance metrics for reliability comparison, and 2 more. Starke Finance counters with 5 features including Validator comparison across performance, fees, and security, Detailed validator rankings, APY comparisons, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. StakeView currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Starke Finance is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
StakeView's key strengths include makes opaque validator selection a data-driven choice, commission history protects delegators from surprise fee hikes, historical view helps identify consistently reliable validators. Starke Finance stands out for helps pick reliable, well-priced validators, combines metrics with educational guides, transparency before delegating.
More comparisons
Compare StakeView with…
Compare Starke Finance with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 1 |
| Twitter Followers | — | 717 |
| Categories | Staking | Staking, Analytics & Charts |
| Description | Solana validator performance rankings with historical APY tracking | Solana validator comparison and staking analytics platform |
Both StakeView and Starke Finance operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. StakeView has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — StakeView is free to start and Starke Finance is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.