Head-to-head · Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (1) |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 5 features |
| Upvotes | ▲ 0 |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Everstake Everstake is one of the largest staking providers in crypto, supporting 130+ networks with over 1.6 million delegators and billions in staked value. Founded in 2018, they've been validating on Solana... StakeView StakeView is a Solana validator performance ranking tool designed to help SOL holders make informed staking decisions. It surfaces historical APY, commission changes, and performance metrics across va...
Both Everstake and StakeView hold similar community ratings, suggesting users find comparable value in each. Your choice should come down to specific features, pricing, and ecosystem fit rather than overall score.
Everstake uses a paid model, while StakeView is free. StakeView has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Everstake's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Everstake offers 5 features including Solana validation since network's early days, ShredStream for optimized block propagation, Stake-Weighted QoS optimization, and 2 more. StakeView counters with 5 features including Historical APY tracking across Solana validators, Commission change history to catch fee increases, Performance metrics for reliability comparison, and 2 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Everstake currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. StakeView is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Everstake's key strengths include one of the longest-running solana validators, enterprise-grade uptime and performance, massive delegator base shows trust. StakeView stands out for makes opaque validator selection a data-driven choice, commission history protects delegators from surprise fee hikes, historical view helps identify consistently reliable validators.
More comparisons
Compare Everstake with…
Compare StakeView with…
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| Twitter Followers | 102,462 | — |
| Categories | Staking | Staking |
| Description | Enterprise staking across 130+ networks with Solana-specific ShredStream optimization | Solana validator performance rankings with historical APY tracking |
Both Everstake and StakeView operate in the staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Neither has a clear community advantage, so your decision should be feature-driven. We recommend trying both — check Everstake's pricing and StakeView is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.