Head-to-head · DeFi & Yield
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated September 1, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (1) | (4) |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | Solana | Solana |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 6 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Hinkal Hinkal is a universal confidential settlement infrastructure for public blockchains including Solana. Using zero-knowledge proofs and stealth addresses, Hinkal enables users to swap, stake, yield farm... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Hinkal is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 5.0/5 stars across 1 review, compared to 4.8/5 for Sanctum (4 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Hinkal uses a freemium model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Sanctum has the edge for budget-conscious users, though Hinkal's paid tier may offer features worth paying for.
Hinkal offers 6 features including Zero-knowledge proof privacy for all DeFi actions, Invisible Wallet browser extension with auto-shielding, Private swaps, staking, yield farming, and payments, and 3 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Hinkal currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Hinkal's key strengths include proven volume with 00m+ in confidential transactions, multi-chain support including solana and evm chains, institutional-grade compliance with viewing keys.
More comparisons
Compare Hinkal with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 86,375 | 80,425 |
| Categories | Security & Audit, DeFi & Yield | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Privacy-preserving DeFi infrastructure for confidential on-chain transactions | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Both Hinkal and Sanctum operate in the defi & yield space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Hinkal has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Hinkal is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.