Head-to-head · Liquid Staking
Features, pricing, health score, community ratings — side-by-side from the live MadeOnSol database.
Updated July 18, 2026
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | (0) | (3) |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Health | Healthy | Healthy |
| Chain | solana only | solana only |
| Open Source | ||
| Features | 5 features | 7 features |
| Upvotes |
Pros & cons
Analysis
Kyros Kyros is a Solana liquid staking protocol designed to optimize staking yields by distributing SOL across top-performing validators. Rather than picking a single validator, it spreads stake to pursue s... Sanctum Sanctum is a liquid staking infrastructure protocol on Solana that has created a unified liquidity layer for all liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Rather than competing with individual LST providers, Sanc...
Sanctum is rated higher by the MadeOnSol community with 4.7/5 stars across 3 reviews, compared to 0.0/5 for Kyros (0 reviews). That said, ratings only tell part of the story — what matters most is which tool fits your specific workflow.
Kyros uses a free model, while Sanctum is free — Free to use. Small fees on LST swaps through the Infinity Pool. No fee to create new LSTs.. Both tools are free, so cost isn't a deciding factor — focus on features and reliability instead.
Kyros offers 5 features including Liquid staking that issues kySOL for staked positions, SOL distributed across top-performing validators, kySOL deployable across DeFi for additional yield, and 2 more. Sanctum counters with 7 features including Infinity pool enabling instant swaps between all Solana LSTs, Validator LST program for creating custom branded liquid staking tokens, INF token providing diversified yield across all LSTs in the pool, and 4 more. The right choice depends on which specific features matter for your use case — check the individual review pages for full breakdowns.
We monitor both tools around the clock for uptime, SSL validity, and response times. Kyros currently has a healthy health status with 100.0% uptime over the last 30 days. Sanctum is rated healthy with 100.0% uptime. For any tool you trust with your funds, trades, or yield, uptime and speed are non-negotiable.
Kyros's key strengths include spreads stake across validators to pursue resilient yields, liquid kysol keeps capital usable instead of locked, composable across defi to stack additional yield.
More comparisons
Compare Kyros with…
Compare Sanctum with…
Explore more
Keep comparing
DEXs, RPC providers, liquid-staking protocols, and trading-bot fees — all compared the same way.
| ▲ 0 |
| ▲ 2 |
| Twitter Followers | 4,940 | 81,071 |
| Categories | Liquid Staking | DeFi & Yield, Staking, Liquid Staking |
| Description | Liquid staking protocol maximizing Solana DeFi yields | Swap between any Solana liquid staking token (LST) instantly — stake SOL, earn yield, and access unified LST liquidity |
Both Kyros and Sanctum operate in the liquid staking space, so this is a direct head-to-head. Sanctum has the community's vote, but your mileage may vary depending on your specific needs. We recommend trying both — Kyros is free to start and Sanctum is free to start. Read user reviews on each tool's page for real-world feedback from the Solana community.